True Cost of Deferred Maintenance

Apr 18, 2011

For some time there has been debate over the alternative solutions to concrete and structural repair issues. Some argue that treating the visible signs and monitoring them closely is a solution, whilst others put forward the thought that rapid response will ultimately lower the long term costs to the owner.

Whilst the prospect of deffered maintenance holds some allure in terms of the ability to minimise the financial impact in one financial year, studies have shown that longer term, deferred maintenance increases the cost of repair several fold. Longer term, signifncant damage to the structural steel can have far reaching structural consequences and can in fact cost upwards of $60billion a year. Most scary of all, this figure represents the cost to the mining industry alone!

 

There are several reasons that reinforce the importance of undertaking maintenance as required, rather than deferring:

  • Concrete spalling will only lead to further degredation of the building structure
    • Concrete which has concrete cancer allows more water ingress allowing further rusting to occur and can cause internal property damage
  • Concrete which spalls at height can fall from the structure without warning; posing significant safety risks
  • Deffering treatment of the underlying problem in favour of close monitoring and aesthetic treatment will increase the time spent on the problem as over time the attnetion required increases.
  • Long term damage to the structure of the building can have negative impact on the value of the property.
    • For body corporates, or owners looking to sell, loss of capital can further offset any 'savings' achieved in the short term.

 

At the end of the day, the decision whether to treat the underlying causes, or to put it off is a subjective one. Sure facts can be useful in making the decision, but ultimately, the decision will be made in light of other oppotrunity costs which may be forgone. At Remedial, we would just caution you to think about the financial and structural effects putting maintenance off can cause.

Tags:

Author: Jeff Anderson

Comments

Post a New Comment

Thin film intumescent application is a specialised process Example of a completed fire rating project Thin Film intumescent application using a spray gun. This steel now has a designated FRL

P&I Printing - Epoxy Floor Solution

P&I printers, located in Sydney's west required a floor that achieved both a non-slip rating whilst maintaining a highly appealing finish

read more

Narrabeen Sands - Commercial Kitchen Floor

The brand new Narrabeen Sands Hotel, recently opened in Sydney?s beachside suburb of Narrabeen, needed the correct floors to be laid.

read more

Stay Connected

Get our latest case studies, industry announcements and information delivered direct to you.

* Denotes required field
*
*
*
submit

Fire Rating cannot be an After thought

The planning of a new building is a time and labour intensive process. Architects and engineers alike spend hour upon hour planning meticulous details, yet too often they forget one key element - passive fire rating